Institutional Process in the Implementation of Special Autonomy: A Historical Institutionalism Analysis of Papua Barat Daya Province, Indonesia

Yakob Kareh; Sukri Sukri; Muh. Akmal  Ibrahim

doi:10.71435/740113

Authors

Yakob Kareh Doctoral Student of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Sukri Department of Administrative Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Muh. Akmal Ibrahim Department of Administrative Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71435/740113

Keywords:

Historical Institutionalism, Path Dependency, Institutional Layering, Special Autonomy, Policy Feedback

Abstract

This study examines how institutional processes in Papua’s Special Autonomy (Otsus) have formed, evolved, and reproduced over more than two decades under Law No. 21/2001 and its 2021 revision. Persistent weakening of MRP representational functions, vertical-horizontal fragmentation, and stagnation in Indigenous Papuan empowerment indicate that Otsus implementation cannot be explained solely through formal institutional design. Drawing on Historical Institutionalism, this study analyses three dimensions of institutional effectiveness: regulatory and procedural clarity, consistency of fund-implementation flows, and effectiveness of coordination and evaluation forums. A qualitative historical-institutional case-study design was applied using process tracing and within-case analysis. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with provincial officials, former Otsus drafters, customary leaders, MRP representatives, NGO actors, academics, and Indigenous Papuan community representatives, supported by document analysis of Otsus laws, implementing regulations, presidential regulations, provincial budget documents, audit reports, and media archives. Coding was conducted using NVivo and validated through triangulation and member checking. The findings show strong normative-administrative clarity, with regulatory foundations scoring 9/10, but weak operational-sequential clarity, with planning sequence, budget flow, and evaluation scoring 4, 3, and 3. Implementation consistency is reproductive rather than transformative: regulations, work units, master plans, and budgets are reproduced, while substantive empowerment remains limited. Layering dominates institutional change, producing old-pattern persistence in MRP functions and budget-authority structures. Coordination forums operate as adaptation channels but fail as policy-feedback mechanisms. The study contributes the concepts of reproductive continuity and transformative continuity to explain why formal stability has not produced substantive institutional transformation in a newly established peripheral province.

References

Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Aulia, A. P., & Tambun, K. Y. (2025). Synchronization of central and regional government policies in public services. Indonesian Journal of Public Administration Review, 2(4), 12. https://doi.org/10.47134/par.v2i4.4758

Badjuka, A. H., Mozin, S. Y., & Nani, Y. N. (2024). Collaborative governance: Optimization of public service performance through the function of customary institutions. PAPATUNG: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Pemerintahan dan Politik, 7(2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.54783/japp.v7i2.1139

Billy Muskitta Bastian Erlando, V. I. C., Soekorini, N., Astutik, S., & Hartoyo, H. (2025). Legal review of local government institutions in Papua under Government Regulation No. 106/2021. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 3(9), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr1368

Carstensen, M. B., & Röper, N. (2022). The other side of agency: Bricolage and institutional continuity. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(8), 1288–1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1936128

Dhakal, K. (2022). NVivo. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(2), 270–272. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1271

Gerschewski, J. (2021). Explanations of institutional change: Reflecting on a "missing diagonal." American Political Science Review, 115(1), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000751

Hall, P. A. (2009). Historical institutionalism in rationalist and sociological perspective. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change (pp. 204–224). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806414.009

Hofmann, S. C., & Yeo, A. (2024). Historical institutionalism and institutional design: Divergent pathways to regime complexes in Asia and Europe. European Journal of International Relations, 30(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661231170717

Irawan, A., & Adam, A. F. (2023). Collaborative governance dalam pembangunan masyarakat perbatasan di Kabupaten Merauke. Musamus Journal of Public Administration, 5(2), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.35724/mjpa.v6i1.5142

Jayuska, R., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., Isharyanto, Marzuki, I., & Fawaid, A. (2025). The ambiguous authority of provincial governors in customary law recognition: Regulatory fragmentation in Indonesia's decentralization era. Khazanah Hukum, 7(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i2.46367

Johnson, R., Mshana, C., Bradshaw, S., Marchal, B., & Gilson, L. (2025). How is process tracing applied in health research? A systematic scoping review. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117507

Kareh, Y., Sukri, & Ibrahim, M. A. (2025). Normative mechanisms in the Papua Special Autonomy policy implementation network. KnE Social Sciences, 10(18), 1616–1630. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19589

Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Madubun, J., & Madubun, H. (2023). Challenges faced by partnership governance in regional development of Maluku Province. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 6(2), 266. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v6i2.46475

Muindi, F., Maithya, H., & Barasa, K. (2022). Socio-economic impacts and challenges of old person cash transfer in Mulundi Sub-Location in Kitui County, Kenya. International Journal of Current Aspects, 6(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.35942/ijcab.v6i2.268

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789

Oderinde, S. L., Alabi, M. O. A., & Adeyeye, A. I. (2024). Impacts of conditionalities on cash transfer beneficiaries in Osun State, Nigeria. Köz-Gazdaság, 19(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.14267/RETP2024.02.07

Ohoiwutun, Y. (2025). Development experience in the land of Papua: A review of the application of the development paradigm. International Journal of Social Science, 5(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v5i1.10835

Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011

Pilon, D. (2021). Beyond codifying common sense: From an historical to critical institutionalism. Studies in Political Economy, 102(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1949787

Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318

Rakia, A. S. R. S., Suaib, H., & Simanjuntak, K. W. (2022). Continuing the limited authority of the Majelis Rakyat Papua: A missed opportunity. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v13.i3.7915

Ramli, U., Nikmatul Ula, S. N., Rumaday, S., Nurlela, A., & Rais, L. (2025). Economic resilience and welfare of older adults after the Paitua assistance program. Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas, 11(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.25077/jsa.11.2.135-153.2025

Sarjito, A., & Mursidi, M. (2025). Decolonizing bureaucracy in Papua: Indigenous logics, institutional hybridity, and the limits of Special Autonomy. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 4(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.57248/jishum.v4i1.665

Schafer, R., & Phillippi, J. C. (2025). Updating and advancing member-checking methods: Use of video and asynchronous technology to optimize participant engagement. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251315395

Shey Blandine, B., & Koulle Brigitte Christelle, N. (2025). Policy failure, policy-implementation gap and policy support programs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, 418. https://doi.org/10.20319/icssh.2025.418

Silambi, E. D., Ismail, N., Septarini, D. F., & Kasim, R. (2023). Protection of agricultural land in realizing sustainable food security. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1253(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1253/1/012022

Situmorang, M. (2025). Conflict transformation in Papua: Challenges and opportunities for top-down Special Autonomy policy. Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 5(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.31957/pjdir.v5i1.4240

Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790997

Tryatmoko, M. W. (2026). Impaired institutionalisation of Special Autonomy and perpetuation of conflict in Papua, Indonesia. In [Book title] (pp. 823–842). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2116-3_58

Wellens, L., & Jegers, M. (2014). Beneficiary participation as an instrument of downward accountability: A multiple case study. European Management Journal, 32(6), 938–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.03.004

Wirawan, A., Raharjo, T., Shintasari, R., & Bagong, F. (2025). Government land protection in the context of legal pluralism: Evidence from Indonesia's Indigenous and peripheral regions. Planning Malaysia, 23. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i39.1935